Cecilia Roberts Webb, et al. v. City of Maplewood, Missouri
Case No.: 4:16-cv-1703-CDP
Court: Eastern District of Missouri
The case challenges the City of Maplewood, Missouri’s longstanding practice of arresting and jailing citizens for failure to pay municipal bonds and fines without inquiring into their ability to pay. You may be eligible for payment from a class action settlement if, between November 1, 2011 and November 18, 2021, you:
Important Dates
Settlement Website: https://www.maplewoodclassaction.com/
In Re GEICO General Insurance Company
Case No.: 4:19-cv-03768-HSG (N.D. Cal.)
Perez v. GEICO Indemnity Company
Case No.4:20-cv-07436 (N.D. Cal.)
Court: Northern District of California, Oakland Division
This class action addresses two classes with claims against several GEICO subsidiaries. The Regulatory Fees Class consists of all individual insureds with comprehensive or collision coverage automobile insurance policies through GEICO for whom GEICO adjustors determined the vehicle was a total loss, did not pay for repairs, and the insured did not retain the vehicle.
The Sales Tax Class consists of individual insureds who leased vehicles that were covered by comprehensive or collision coverage through GEICO, for whom GEICO determined their vehicle was a total loss and did not pay for repairs nor include ACV Sales Tax in the Total Loss Claim Payments, and the insured did not retain the vehicle.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: http://www.californiatotallossclassactiontaxes.com/
Anurag Gupta and by and through him, D.G. and V.G., his minor children, et al. v. Aeries Software, Inc.
Case No.: 8:20-cv-00995-FMO-ADS
Court: Central District of California
If you are in the United States and had an Aeries Software, Inc. account through the San Dieguito Union High School District at the time of a data breach which occurred beginning on or about November 4, 2019, you may be eligible to participate in this class action settlement.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: https://www.schooldatabreach.com/
Alexander v. Carrington
Case No.: 1:20-cv-2369-RDB
If you had a mortgage through Carrington and have paid fees to make mortgage payments online or over the phone (convenience fees), you may be eligible for payment from this class action settlement. This class action alleges that the convenience fees violate the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act and various state consumer protection laws.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: http://mortgageservicefeesettlement.com/
Gorzo, et al. v. Rodan & Fields, LLC
Case No.: CJC-18-004981
If you purchased Lash Boost for personal, family, or household purposes between October 1, 2016 and March 11, 2022, and you have not already returned the product for a refund, you may be eligible for payment from this class action settlement.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: https://lbsettlement.com/
Mitchell, et al. v. Intero Real Estate Services
Case No.: 5:18-cv-05623-BLF (N.D. Cal.)
If you received calls promoting Intero Real Estate Services at a phone number registered on the National Do Not Call Registry between September 13, 2014 and December 19, 2019, you may be eligible for payment from this class action lawsuit.
Important Dates
Settlement Website:
Susan Wang, et al. v. StubHub, Inc.
Case No.: CGC-18-564120
If you were in California and purchased a ticket from the StubHub.com website or mobile website between September 1, 2015 and September 1, 2019, you may be eligible for payment from a class action settlement. This class action lawsuit alleges that StubHub’s method of revealing ticket fees charged to purchasers only at checkout did not comply with California’s consumer protection laws.
Important Dates
Settlement Website:
Susan Roy v. ESL Federal Credit Union
Case No.: 19-CV-6122-FPG
If you were an ESL Federal Credit Union account holder during January 1, 2016 through October 31, 2019 and were charged retry fees (returned item fees that were charged and not refunded for Automated Clearing House and check transactions which were re-submitted by a merchant) or sufficient funds fees (overdraft fees which that were charged and not refunded when there was enough money in the account holder’s account to cover the transaction in question if holds placed on deposits and pending debit card transactions were not deducted from the amount in the account), you may be eligible for payment from a class action settlement.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: https://royclassactionsettlement.com/
Sharon T. Glass and Leric and Joyce Perryman, et al. v. Delta Community Credit Union
Case No.: 2019CV317322
Current or former members of Delta Community Credit Union during February 26, 2013 – October 31, 2019 who were charged and not refunded fees on signature point of sale debit card transactions where there were sufficient funds at the time the transaction was authorized but insufficient funds at the time the transaction was presented to Delta for payment and posted to a member’s account may be eligible to participate in a class action settlement as part of the APPSN Fee Class.
Current or former members of Delta Community Credit Union during February 26, 2013 to April 30, 2020 who were charged and not refunded fees for Automated Clearing House (ACH) and check transactions that were re-submitted by a merchant after being returned for insufficient funds may be eligible to participate in a class action settlement as part of the Retry Fee Class.
Important Dates
Settlement Website: https://glassperrymanclassactionsettlement.com/
We look forward to hearing from you.